|
No wonder then that the BDG despite its poor theoretical reputation continues to wreak havoc at club level, and occasionally at master level as well. This trend is likely to continue unless you are lucky enough to be a member of this forum and reading this right now!
There are three ways to meet a gambit 1) Acceptance 2) Decline 3) Counter Gambit and the method chosen is largely a matter of taste, however, I have noticed that gambiteers and BDG specialists in particular hate to defend and for this reason I think the third method listed is the most unpleasant for them to face. Having said that, it is my contention that black can take the offered pawn with impunity, nevertheless the line I am recommending here is a combination of both the second and third methods, with the added bonus that it offers strong counterplay without gambiting a pawn (Sounds cool doesn't it). The line in question is called the O'Kelly defence, and in my opinion it is one of the best counters to the BDG, it also has the added benefit of being able to be used by Caro Kann players. Ok, that's enough hype don't you think, now its time to get to work .
The following two games along with the accompanying analysis will equip you to face your next encounter against the dreaded BDG with confidence and conviction, and for white players attempting to refute my analysis (Good luck you'll need it! ) you have my condolences.
Short-Bareev, Sarajevo, 2000
Alburt-Tal, Baku, 1972
|
|