|
The real point is whether both parties should have been given a warning (since the incident didn't affect the tournament in any way), some type of probation for a certain number of tournaments, or expulsion of both players. Most of the bystanders listening to the testimony felt that Hikaru, one of America's brightest stars, was given preferential treatment given his status and his stepfather's influence. Hikaru set a U.S. record by becoming the youngest Master in history at 10 years old. He has also appeared on the cover of U.S. Chess Life twice in the past several months, so throwing him out would cause an outrage.
Bystanders were demanding that Akeem be reinstated with a bye in the round not played, or that Hikaru also be thrown out. Goichberg appeared to be biased and irrational in his reasoning when pressed to explain his decision. Could it have been possible that bystanders witnessing Akeem's punch did not see the whole incident? Perhaps. Is it reasonable to believe that Hikaru would not defend himself at all when hit by Akeem (that is if he didn't throw the first punch)? After discussing the matter with Bruce Thompson, Akeem's father, Goichberg agreed to provide free passage to a future tournament instead of refunding the entire $250 entry fee.
Editor's note: When one throws a 12-year old chess player out of a chess tournament, things have gone entirely too far. Akeem, who has a passion for the game, had to spend the rest of the tournament roaming around watching others play. Why contribute to killing a child's passion for the game by meting out such a harsh penalty?? In no way did this incident affect the tournament and in my mind Goichberg has committed a very serious error. Any chessplayer of integrity can see this.
Posted by The Chess Drum: 10 July 2002
|
|